Conservatives, BC

Legislature loonies

On February 24, Coquitlam-Maillardville MLA Jennifer Blatherwick made a motion in the BC Legislature asking the House to condemn U.S. President Trump’s proposed tariffs and endorse retaliatory action.

Eighty-six MLAs voted YEA, five MLAs voted NAY. The five who oppose Canadians reacting to American provocations were BC Conservatives:

  • Tara Armstrong, Kelowna-Lake Country-Coldstream,
  • Dallas Brodie, Vancouver-Quilchena,
  • Brent Chapman, Surrey South,
  • Jordan Kealy, Peace River North,
  • Heather Maahs, Chilliwack North.

The surprising thing here is that only five Conservatives refused to favour a meaningful response to Trump’s sanctions. Some in the party are aligned with the far-right and with people who oppose science and embrace white supremacy and outlandish conspiracy theories.

  • Non-scientist Tara Armstrong worked in the seniors transportation business. That didn’t stop her from attacking physician Peter Hotez over his warnings about the dangers of COVID-19. The doctor is a distinguished pediatrician-scientist, co-director of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development, and serves as professor and dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine.
  • The Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs (UBCIC) expressed concern about residential school denialism after a tweet from MLA Dallas Brodie. Grand Chief Stewart Phillip said, “Ms. Brodie’s picking and choosing of which facts to scrutinize is a misuse of her power in public office and demonstrates her bias and a profound disrespect for survivors of Residential Schools.”
  • Perhaps inspired by compulsive liar Alex Jones, Brent Chapman suggested the shootings at the Quebec Mosque, Sandy Hook elementary school and the Orlando nightclub were faked. Chapman also referred to Muslims as, “little inbred walking, talking, breathing time bombs…” and he made comments about residential schools that Indigenous leaders condemned as “racist and despicable.”
  • Jordan Kealy said the mysterious “THEY” intend to kill off farms and force people to eat bugs because “Control the food and you control the people.” According to Kealy, the same villains spray “things in the air” to create weather extremes, droughts, and fires. Kealy also believes that airplane vapour trails are chemtrails. Believers in this conspiracy theory say chemtrails exist to manipulate and control humans and/or test biological or chemical agents on innocent people.
  • In early 2024, the Chilliwack Board of Education censured trustee Heather Maahs for the third time in a year. One was for an alleged breach of confidentiality, another for Maahs’ failure to support the integrity of the Board, and the third was for Maah’s opposition to the Board’s inclusive practices.

I hope John Rustad’s Conservatives do not vote to reduce mental health funding. It seems a few in the caucus could use some help.

Categories: Conservatives, BC

8 replies »

  1. I believe we came within a couple of seats of having these folks installed as Cabinet Ministers in the B.C. government. Had Rustad and the BC Conservatives narrowly prevailed in the last election instead of the other way around, he could not have afforded them as disgruntled backbenchers (they have already shown why), and as he doesn’t appear to have the character or tools to control them, likely would have appeased them with status.

    We need only to look at Trump’s picks for governmental (with emphasis on the last five letters of that word) hierarchy to see whether such outlandish scenarios are possible. They are so unqualified and unhinged as to be truly frightening.

    This should be remembered well here for the next provincial election and for the looming federal election when Trump and Musk’s pick for Prime Minister is leading the Conservative Party of Canada.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Do facts actually matter or just the slander part?
    I know for a fact Jordan doesn’t write posts on the farm page, and the posts you refer to are all signed by someone else.
    So, I’m assuming just the slander part matters?

    Like

    • Slander generally involves false statements.

      From Scientific American (admittedly a journal not read by conspiracy theory adherents):

      A conspiracy theory can provide comfort by identifying a convenient scapegoat and thereby making the world seem more straightforward and controllable. People can assume that if these bad guys weren’t there, then everything would be fine. Whereas if you don’t believe in a conspiracy theory, then you just have to say terrible things happen randomly.

      From PressProgress

      null

      Like

      • Instead of repeating someone else’s false statements, try looking at the source of the supposed statements he made.
        Look directly at the farm page.
        If slander = false statements, then you are slandering him. As well, the source of your information there is also slandering him.

        Like

        • If Mr.F was slandering whoever, you can bet your bottom dollar they would be in courts suing him instantly.

          Do you hear anything?

          No?

          Exactly.

          No slander here, how hard you look. Fact is the truth can be very damning especially ones previous silly statements.

          Like

          • The doctrine of acquiescence should be kept in mind by anyone who is alleging slander here. As well as the fact that alleging slanderous conduct could in itself constitute slanderous conduct.

            Like

Be on topic and civil. If your comment does not appear, email normanfarrell.ca@gmail.com

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *