One hand washes another

A principle of management states that senior staff lead by example when it comes to ethics and morality. Behaviours of leaders set the values that their followers use. Another certainty is that people who know about skeletons in the closet use that knowledge for their own advantage.

Treatment accorded executives at BC Ferries, BC Hydro, BCiMC and other agencies and ministries demonstrates those principles are operative in the Liberal government. A while back, Bill Tieleman wrote about an internal government report on BC Hydro, which he said,

“must have been written in a burning glass factory, because it’s full of smoke and mirrors.”

Tieleman provided the obvious explanation about why the report was useless,

“Hardly surprising the government emerges unscathed, because the report was authored by Premier Christy Clark’s own Deputy Minister John Dyble, Finance Minister Kevin Falcon’s Deputy Minister Peter Milburn and Advanced Education Acting Deputy Minister Cheryl Wenezenki-Yolland, B.C.’s former comptroller general.”

I thought it worth looking at whether or not the authors had enjoyed special treatment during the days of net zero. I also examined the record for Dave Nikolejsin, the senior bureaucrat managing the untendered contract referred to in my previous article. I think this graph needs no further comment.

I heard a red-neck commentator on a local radio station ranting about careless spending of a provincial social service agency. Bruce Allen would have had more credibility if he had complained about waste at all levels of government.

For example, do senior bureaucrats need to consistently spend $3,000 or so per month on expenses? John Dyble, Peter Milburn and many others do. In fact, Milburn, a Deputy in the Ministry of Finance, spent almost $5,000 a month during fiscal 2012; Dana Hayden and Rick Davis even more. Davis averaged $6,000 in monthly expenses during the last five years.

Categories: Not-Net-Zero

3 replies »

  1. What exactly are these people expensing? I am a civil servant and I have to provide my own meals and transportation to and from work. Other than that my employer provides the equipment and supplies to do my job. And how can we find out what they are claiming as expenses. Seems very fishy to me.


  2. The bigger question is WHY do they feel they are entitled to such large expense accounts? A warped sense of entitlement would be my guess.


  3. This can all be reversed…by an “order in council” from the new government when they are elected shortly. Expenses would have to pass the test “of a requirement to do the job” that the individual was required to do.
    The Auditor General will have a field day, within the next 12 months, conducting forensic audits, of all such transactions, within these expense accounts. A lot of work will have to be done, to ensure the BC Taxpayer is getting and has received “value for dollar”, with regards to these”expenses”.

    Broken moral compasses and bloated ego's, not to mention a warped sense of entitlement.

    This is the only way to ensure that this nonsense does not continue, and that funds that are expensed, “inappropriatley”, will be returned to the taxpayers of the province.


Leave a reply but be on topic and civil.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s