I added the following as a comment to the previous article but this item adds graphs to further illustrate the points.
I want to add to Mr. Andersen’s comments about the billions in deferred debt that BC Hydro has been adding during recent years. My analysis of two decades of financial statements reveals they are doing something else to conceal costs of operations and create phony profits that are transferred to the province as dividends, even though the utility’s need for cash is so desperate that each year’s borrowings take 10 digits to describe.
The amounts of operating expenses capitalized each year recently is without precedent in earlier BC Hydro operations. That means they transfer certain costs from operating expense accounts to property, plant and equipment. Those assets are depreciated at varying rates but most BCH assets are written off over periods that last from 15 to 100 years.
Companies that want to show higher short term profits may capitalize expenses aggressively, particularly if there are no tax consequences. Private companies aiming to reduce current income tax payments, try to expense as much as possible for immediate write-offs and capitalize minimum amounts.
From the financial statements, it appears BC Hydro has decided to capitalize as much as possible and thereby minimize expenses. As I indicated, what they’ve been doing lately is out line with years before Christy Clark was Premier.
Consider that domestic power consumption has not changed in the past decade but the undepreciated balance of BC Hydro’s property, plant and equipment has doubled from $10 billion to $20 billion. And, with planned projects, it may double again in the next decade, even though BC electricity consumers will continue consuming quantities of electricity similar to the amounts in 2006.
— Norm Farrell (@Norm_Farrell) March 17, 2016