Health

Liberal supports health system privatization

Candidates were asked a simple question at an April 20 Tri-Cities campaign meeting:

Do you support the privatization of our healthcare system?

Liberal incumbent Linda Reimer gave a revealing answer:

I do support the privatization, to a certain extent, of our healthcare system…

I myself have had surgery in the private healthcare system… I do support some choice for those who are able to afford it.

Yes, that is the attitude shared by the moneyed class. If you can afford it, you should be entitled to jump the queues and get medical care while the less fortunate wait. Linda Reimer did it herself.

At least Reimer was honest in admitting that Liberals want to privatize health service. However, she was not truthful in claiming at the meeting that Liberals plan to increase provincial spending on health by $4.2 billion over three years. The actual number is less than half that amount.

exp increase

The numbers are taken from the Budget and Fiscal Plan 2017-18 – 2019/20:

expense

Dr. Vanessa Brcic, a Vancouver-based family physician and community-based researcher, published last year about health care systems, public and private. Excerpts:

Evidence indicates that privately funded health services and long public wait times go hand in hand, and that growth in private payment will do nothing to alleviate it.

Let’s look at the evidence:

  • Koehoorn et al. studied cost of care and return-to-work time for 1380 WCB patients in BC who received privately funded and public services for knee surgery, and found that expedited, privately funded care was more expensive and did not improve return to work times – patients receiving care in the public system did marginally better for a fraction of the cost.
  • Australia expanded private insurance, and found that it did not decrease wait times; rather, in regions where private insurance was most often used, wait times in the public sector rose.
  • Tuohy et al, in a study of all OECD nations with parallel private insurance for health care, found that privately funded care produces longer wait times and draws resources out of the public system.4 They also note that shortening wait times in the pubic system is usually most successfully achieved by increasing the amount of public investment, not by increasing the amount of private investment.
  • Beasly, studying patterns of private insurance in the UK, found that increased use of private payment is correlated with increased waiting lists, and that the two are causally related. As more patients and physicians use the private pay system, not only do the resources leave the publicly-funded system, but the pressure to restore public resources declines, as fewer people (and in particular fewer affluent people) apply political pressure to ensure that public wait lists are addressed.

Categories: Health

4 replies »

  1. Give them four more years and watch out. Terminate them now but do not be surprised at the contracts Ms. Christy has signed with corporate friends obligating the next government for decades to come. A very sad situation.

    Like

  2. So the contracts signed by this government selling off resources, pretty well bankrupting our public utility, selling off our precious land, contracting out services (think healthcare and the Sodexo’s, Aramarks, long term care private contracts, (now being sold off to China – Anbang) and now we are paying more and more than before for the care of our parents, grandparents. Company’s are pocketing a lot of money, but the average citizen, what’s happened to the care? We see what’s going on with our elderly, the sick, etc.

    The link I attach has to do with energy, but could very well be looked at with all contracts that aren’t in the public’s interests.

    Quotes from link:
    “65-year term, set a fixed price”; “They reviewed the history behind the contract and pointed out how unfair, especially the renewal provision, is.” “And the legal issue is whether or not we have been treated fairly … particularly, the renewal contract has just kicked in, and that’s a 25 year contract. And as I said, the price goes down and inequity gets worse and worse … so even if we can change on an ongoing basis, we’re talking about billions and billions of dollars.”

    It may not be final in the SCOC, but it is something we should be paying attention too, especially with what’s gone on in this province for the past 16 years.

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/churchill-falls-supreme-court-review-ron-penney-1.4079217

    Like

Leave a reply but be on topic and civil.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s