Kinder Morgan

Fossil fuel pollution we forget

After Canada’s federal government asked its energy regulator to examine broader environmental effects of the Energy East pipeline project by TransCanada Corp, including upstream and downstream emissions, the proponent, a company with substantial American ownership, abandoned the project.

emissions 275According to Alberta politicians and their fossil fuel puppeteers, investigating all impacts of oil and gas development and placing conditions on multinational energy companies constitutes an “attack on Alberta.” They prefer that dangerous pollution be ignored. If forced to do something about it, they want taxpayers to pay the costs.

For example, at the beginning of 2018, Alberta is still fumbling to impose ways of measuring and moderating fugitive emissions from oil and gas production. BC is in the same situation. Both governments face opposition from producers that want to continue gentle self-regulation.

Yale Climate Connections provides information:

Natural gas is predominately composed of methane. When methane is burned to produce electricity or heat, it releases carbon dioxide and water vapor.

But not all natural gas produced is burned. Some of it is leaked at gas wells, in compressor stations, from pipelines, or in storage. Methane is a powerful but short-lived greenhouse gas. While it is in the atmosphere, it is around 120 times more powerful than carbon dioxide per ton…

The review principles applied for Energy East were not used in evaluating the western project of Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain pipeline. While Justin Trudeau’s government is willing to trample on the interests of 4.6 million people in BC, it was frightened of approving a project that might see them lose political support among the 22 million residents of Ontario and Quebec.

Because Trans Mountain’s tarsands product is exported by ship from Burrard Inlet, the Alberta-British Columbia pipeline causes pollution that most people forget. Increasing dilbit tanker movements from 60 a year to 400 will cause vastly more impacts. American and Finnish scientists, in a peer-reviewed paper published by Nature, discussed public health and climate impacts of fuels burned in global shipping:

Ship power systems emit a wide variety of pollutants that have important health and climate change impacts. Fine particulate matter, sulphur oxides (SOx), and nitrogen oxides (NOx) that emerge from ship smokestacks lead to premature mortality and morbidity effects that are well documented. In particular, SOx emissions from sulphate (SO4) aerosols that increase human health risks and contribute to acidification in terrestrial and aquatic environments…

Without cleaner ship fuels, ship-related health impacts include ~400,000 premature deaths from lung cancer and cardiovascular disease and ~ 14 million childhood asthma cases annually…

According to Nabu, a German environmental group, most ships run on the dirtiest fuels available. They calculated that one cruise ship — despite the industry’s claims that vessels are clean and green — produces as many emissions as a million cars.

British Columbians have been told that natural gas, extracted, liquefied, transported, regassified and burned in Asia, is clean energy. So too with dilbit from the Alberta tar sands. Supporters of expanded exports allow us to measure greenhouse gases produced in end consumption but prefer we ignore all other emissions that result.

3 replies »

  1. This is the same as Vancouver claiming to be a Green City, why not ask Port Metro Vancouver what those 18 freighters sitting in English Bay are burning in their generators which run 24 hours a day.
    Oh by the way, not all those boats are here to load up in Vancouver, the majority are there because there is no work for them to go to and PMV has given the shipping company’s a cheep rate to anchor in BC waters. They have also taken over Naniamo, and now parts of the Gulf Islands. Polluting our air for cheap moorage. Just like oil from Alberta, our risk,their gain.


  2. “After Canada’s federal government and its energy regulator chose to examine broader environmental effects of Trans Mountain’s Energy East pipelines, including upstream and downstream emissions, the American owned company abandoned the project.”

    My naivety may show but I fail to see why two different sets of N.E.B. study rules for two regions of one country shouldn’t be met as a legal challenge on it’s own merit. We of course know it was a political decision but why should it be allowed to stand. The West’s environment is every bit as important as Justin’s home riding. So too is our health.


  3. Not a peep out of Notley when Energy east was stopped, the collusion between Trudeau & Notley is duly noted, hopefully by many who vote.


Leave a reply but be on topic and civil.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s