Climate Change

A captured government

A piece concerning Alberta’s Premier, from a newsletter is worth attention. It is published by an international non-governmental organization. Toronto Star reports the Danielle Smith convoy that travelled to Dubai for the 28th United Nations Climate Change conference actually involved 150 government and petroleum industry representatives.

Air Canada quotes a single return air fare of about $3,000. Two weeks of modest accommodation in the UAE would add another $6,000. Meals, entertainment and incidentals for two weeks probably cost another $4,000 for each person. Add the salaries and fringe costs for this group and pretty soon, real money is involved. But, of course, it is a drop in the bucket compared to the hundreds of billions of dollars that climate change is costing.

Not long ago, Alberta’s tar sands promoters labeled as unethical the oil produced by “tyrannical dictatorships” in the Middle East. Danielle Smith now sees those producers as allies in the efforts to slow the transition to clean energy and extend the life of fossil fuels.

Markham Hislop, Western Canada’s top energy journalist, wrote this:

Energi Media

Another item by Markham Hislop includes this:

Today from BBC, about intentions of the nation hosting COP28.

What’s being said behind closed doors at COP28:

Bob Mankoff H/T Lance Harrison on Facebook

Categories: Climate Change

8 replies »

  1. So who you going to call? “Smith busters”.

    But it really is hard to blame the O & G industry for their course. They have bought the best advocate for their play that money can buy. Her damage will be executed over one or maybe two election cycles then maybe hook up with Preston M or do a Horgan and sit on some boards or network a high-paying consulting job in private industry. No time-out in the penalty box for her.

    Her damage of course will be on a generational time line however by exacerbating the climate tipping point that we may have already crossed.

    The people of Alberta are the only source of correction that can right the ship but to this point, they seem to be quite comfortable as spectators. Is there
    any Canadian version of an RFKjr type waiting in the wings to lead the charge with enough credible support to effect real change? If so who might that be?

    Crickets so far. Onwards and downwards is the path Albertans have chosen to this point and BC is paying the same hand with LNG.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Here is an overview of Alberta’s current and projected budget.

    https://www.alberta.ca/revenue

    Alberta is a one-horse province, and neither Smith nor Notely (who has previously shown her non-renewable resource cards) will shoot that horse. Even if it is slowly dying anyway, as evidenced by their own projections. They’ve developed and offered no alternate vision, and so that bullet would end their political careers.

    They are captured through docile, self-interested surrender, not battle.

    Like

    • Readers of science fiction literature are more likely to put faith in the future of gravity generators than others. This NASA discussion provides useful information about the subject for those of us who prefer other genres.

      ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY

      Like

      • I can’t find any history about David Adair from trustworthy sources. There is plenty of material that originates from Adair or Ufology sites. This is a comment about Adair found on Quora:

        It is difficult to say definitively whether or not David Adair is a fraud, as opinions about him are divided and there is a lack of concrete evidence either way.

        David Adair is a controversial figure who claims to have worked for the U.S. government as a rocket scientist and engineer and to have had involvement with highly classified projects involving advanced technology, such as anti-gravity propulsion and extraterrestrial intelligence. Some people view him as a credible and knowledgeable source on these topics, while others consider him to be a fraud or a conspiracy theorist.

        There are some concerns about the veracity of Adair’s claims, as he has made some statements that appear to contradict known scientific principles and has provided limited or conflicting evidence to support his assertions. Additionally, some critics have suggested that Adair’s claims may be motivated by a desire for attention or personal gain.

        Ultimately, whether or not David Adair is a fraud is a matter of personal interpretation and opinion. It’s important to approach any claims made by individuals with a healthy dose of skepticism and to seek out reliable sources and evidence to support or refute those claims.

        Like

        • Richard Dawkins, certainly high in the category of brilliant scientists, maintains that good science fiction can teach us science and scientific principles, most importantly the methods used in examining evidence and how scientists go about proving or disproving theories. He recommends the novel The Black Cloud by Fred Hoyle as a prime example.

          Carl Sagan (no slouch as a scientist) said, “Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep thoughts can be winnowed from deep nonsense.”

          I can find no forum where David Adair’s “work” has been subjected to rigorous scientific review. This appears to be because he has produced no technical papers worthy of serious review, and because he is not part of the scientific community that would conduct such an examination. He does serve the needs of the credulous UFO community and its exploiters admirably however, and there is much evidence of that.

          Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply to Lew Edwardson Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *