A post on MEDIUM caught the eye of an IN-SIGHTS reader who was researching Jordan Peterson, the dangerous Canadian practitioner of right-wing politics. BBC quotes a review of a Peterson book by literary critic Johanna Thomas-Corr:
He repeatedly identifies masculinity with order and femininity with chaos and makes it clear which side he feels we should favour.
Of course, that’s just one of the criticisms of Peterson.
The College of Psychologists of Ontario examined Peterson’s online conduct and found that it appeared to be degrading, demeaning and unprofessional. He was ordered to enter a professional coaching program to improve his behaviour. Peterson asked Ontario’s courts to overturn the order. In the last week, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed Peterson’s appeal with costs.
The writer of the MEDIUM article was J.D. Blackburn. He posted Unmasking Pierre Poilievre: The Demagogue’s Playbook and Its Dangers for Canada.
Blackburn is focused on Poilievre, but lies and demagoguery are part of the right-wing, conservative playbook. With less than ten weeks before BC’s provincial election, expect to see numerous examples on display. I quote from Blackburn’s article:
I want to start this article with an important clarification: I am not affiliated with any party and consider myself a political orphan. I am neither liberal nor conservative but rather a centrist who believes in contextual politics.
…In recent years, political figures using demagoguery to gain power have become increasingly common. In Canada, Pierre Poilievre is one such example. This article breaks down his psychological and political tactics, showing how he uses them and explaining why they are dangerous for our society.
We will also draw parallels with Donald Trump and the MAGA movement in the United States, as well as the QAnon cult, a fertile ground for conspiracy theories that are also gaining traction in our country.
What is a Demagogue?
A demagogue is someone who seeks popular support by exploiting the passions, fears, prejudices, and emotions of the public rather than using rational or logical arguments. Here are some characteristics of a demagogue:
— Exploiting statistics by distorting correlations disguised as causalities to influence opinion.
— Promoting conspiracy theories when necessary.
— Undermining public trust in institutions.
— Polarizing society through rhetoric.
— Attacking opponents with personal insults, portraying them as enemies of the people and dehumanizing them.
The Psychological Tactics of Demagogues
— Exploiting Emotions
Demagogues like Pierre Poilievre exploit collective emotions, especially fear and anger, to influence public opinion. By presenting himself as a defender against perceived threats, he creates a sense of urgency and crisis. He repeatedly hammers the same themes, stirring up frustrations and the fear he generates through his rhetoric. Emotional appeals are powerful because…
— Simplifying Complex Issues
For a demagogue and his base, complex political issues are often reduced to simple, binary choices. This tactic, known as a “false dilemma,” allows people to form an opinion without fully understanding the nuances…
— Conspiracy Theories and Misleading Correlations
Poilievre is known for spreading conspiracy theories and presenting correlations as causalities. For example, he might link economic hardships directly to government policies without recognizing broader global factors. This misleading representation simplifies the narrative and directs public anger…
The complete MEDIUM article adds much detail. We should remember that the tactics Blackburn examines are used by right-wing politicians everywhere, including British Columbia.

Rage Farming Is Poisoning Our Politics. How to Resist

Categories: Democracy, Prejudice, Truthiness


Demagogues appeal by offering simple solutions and removing the responsibility for critical thinking. I don’t know how this effect can be countered.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This morning I noticed Norm’s post on X yesterday to the effect that Facebook had removed the link he posted there to this article.
I wonder if it relates to the fact that Meta has banned content from Canadian news sources in response to Bill C-18, rather than censorship of the specific topic covered by the article. They must consider (rightly) this site a Canadian news source. Either way, Meta is not our friend.
It was a snarky response to Norm’s post that caught my eye though. It read, “I don’t see the problem. Leftists like censorship and ask for more of it continuously.”
A scroll through the author of that statement’s contributions to rational discourse revealed that any response to him would be futile. His entire activity on X appears to consist of reposting exactly the sort of rage farming described here in Norm’s article, and demonstrating through his comments to those posts that he has been harvested by the demagogues. He is a poster boy for the mindlessly enraged.
His reply to Norm’s post has received its due however, and it is in my opinion the most appropriate response to these folks on X; and that is silence.
LikeLiked by 1 person