Today, we talked mostly about provincial revenues from natural resources. I’ll be back with Ian next week to talk about BC Ferries. You can listen at the CFAX 1070 website or here:
Categories: CFAX 1070 - Jessop & Farrell
Lest we appear too modest there is no example too far above our own to emulate. Certainly not Green China's.…
Canada took some of the Finnish happiness away in the semi-finals of the Olympic men's hockey this morning. I'm sure…
Much of Trumps family graft is centred on real estate hence the plan to rebuild Gaza ; no doubt in…
Depopulation? A terrific idea among certain officials in certain quarters https://twitter.com/i/status/2024409112985932104 Remove humans from the workplace? It will take only…
[…] Over the past decade, the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (Ice) has amassed millions of data points that…
in-sights.ca 
Fascinating to hear about the BC investment portfolio. I don’t agree with your comments about marijuana and sex trade (if legal corporate investment) but regardless, how can you invest in a corporate product that you are currently suing? Ethics should be a central point of such a provincial government organization. The weapons trade is another example. Depressing that funds managers are such amoral individuals. I am reminded of a quote by a 1960s advertising executive who was Jewish. The gist of which was, “if the money was right, I would devise campaigns to sell you on the idea that NAZI Airlines were a great airline to fly”.
LikeLike
You're right. My comment about drugs and sex trade was tortured. I was trying to say that, just because something is legally possible and capable of offering a high return, doesn''t mean it is appropriate for investment of public funds. Your example of the advertising agent is better.
LikeLike