Dysfunctional duopoly

Canada’s two main political parties, Liberals and Conservatives, are similar to America’s Democrats and Republicans. This country accommodates smaller federal parties (NDP, GPC and PPC) and regional representation (BQ), but as in the USA, federal and regional governments are controlled by duopolies. Western Canada is unique in that Conservatives have taken on different party names and New Democrats form one-half of the ruling pairs.

An article in Harvard Business Review examined the dysfunctions of American politics. Many of the assertions deserve consideration by Canadians. Katherine Gehl and Michael Porter say:

Far from being “broken,” our political system is doing precisely what it’s designed to do. It wasn’t built to deliver results in the public interest or to foster policy innovation, nor does it demand accountability for failure to do so. Instead, most of the rules that shape day-to-day behavior and outcomes have been perversely optimized—or even expressly created—by and for the benefit of the entrenched duopoly at the center of our political system…

The authors believe present systems are incapable of delivering solutions to key economic and social challenges and they are not optimistic that beneficial changes will occur. Gehl and Porter reached five key considerations about the nature of American politics:

Although people tend to think of the American political system as a public institution based on high-minded principles and impartial structures and practices derived from the Constitution, it’s not. Politics behaves according to the same kinds of incentives and forces that shape competition in any private industry.

The dysfunctions of the politics industry are perpetuated by unhealthy competition and barriers to entry that secure the duopoly’s position regardless of results.

• Our political system will not correct itself. There are no countervailing forces or independent and empowered regulators to restore healthy competition.

• Certain strategic changes to the rules of the game in elections and legislating would alter incentives in ways that create healthy competition, innovation, and accountability.

• Business, in pursuing its short-term interests, has become a major participant in the political-industrial complex, exacerbating its dysfunction. The business community must reexamine its engagement model and throw its weight behind structural political innovation that would benefit both business and society in the long term.

Gehl and Porter hold out hope for democracy if changes are made to electoral systems. Their preference is for Ranked Choice Voting. However, material modifications are inevitably resisted by entrenched powers.

We saw that in BC in 2018 when the NDP government pretended to favour reform but required a supermajority for change and was happy to have a long time party insider join with Liberals to lead a small group of power-brokers working to defeat proportional representation.

First-past-the-post does not serve democracy, but it does serve British Columbia’s political duopoly.

Categories: Democracy

6 replies »

  1. In a recent exchange of mail with a fellow local activist with regard to dealing with a government bureaucracy, the two of us were bemoaning the idea that ignorance, indifference and self-interest are major obstacles to any notion of progress, and that these are precisely the phenomena on which pretty much all of our public structures are based, ably aided by a population that is most skilled in the practise of those three disciplines. It doesn’t foster great hope for the future.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. The final five and ranked choice voting system might have some merit and offer a way out of the current unsatisfactory duopoly.

    But given the chaos we’ve recently witnessed with a simple plurality system in most of the “United” States, where roughly one third of the population thinks the last election was stolen by fraudulent voting, it’s very hard to imagine acceptance to a degree that would lead to implementation.

    In any case, since it would require a certain level of voter sophistication that does not exist in order to work, it’s probably an idea ahead of it’s time.


    • Try dealing with TransLink and it’s ossified bureaucracy. All they do is hire spin doctors, desperately trying to hide the vast reservoir of incompetence that resides within.


  3. money laundering
    BC legislature raid 1 and 2
    check frpc and list donations high to low ,in BC ,and you will find 6 figure figures donated in past.


Leave a reply but be on topic and civil.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s