Housing

Tax breaks for billionaires instead of public housing

The Tyee and Canada’s National Observer consistently produce independent journalism worth our attention. While browsing recent stories at The Tyee, one stood out. It’s an account of a billionaire family receiving a tax break for a long-vacant Vancouver property that once housed hundreds of low-income residents.

Today, Little Mountain is devoid of residents, despite years of promises that affordable housing would return.

The Tyee story is about more than a tax concession. It illustrates how politics in British Columbia has shifted over time.

Founded on principles of economic equality and public responsibility, the BC NDP now accommodates large private capital interests. Policies that once would have been challenged as favouring wealth and privilege are increasingly defended as pragmatic governance, leaving many traditional social-democratic ideals at the margins.

The result is an environment in which policies benefiting wealthy property owners coexist with a persistent shortage of affordable housing.

Vancouver Tenants Union member Nathan Crompton wrote in 2023 about the history of the Little Mountain property near Main Street and 33rd Avenue:

British Columbia could have embraced the style of Vienna. The Austrian city has a population larger than Vancouver, although Metro Vancouver has more residents than the Vienna region.

Leadership in 20th-century Vienna embraced public ownership. More than half of residents live in subsidized or city-owned public housing. CBC reported in 2016 that Vienna had eight times as much social housing as Vancouver. The result in 2026 is a city where housing is relatively affordable when compared with other major European centres.

Nathan Crompton explained why public housing at Little Mountain remains a low priority for politicians who hold the levers of power.

The Tyee updates the sad story of Little Mountain:

Categories: Housing

1 reply »

  1. Saying isn’t doing.

    The latest Federal/Provincial Housing Initiative jointly announced by Mr Carney and Mr Eby hasn’t swayed those most affected. An estimate of why the Provincial NDP went so far off its Social Housing Promises is in your report

    Tax breaks for billionaires instead of public housing

    The CBC takes analysis a step further,

    =====================================================================

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/bc-ottawa-housing-deal-municipal-analysis-9.7245322

    Question of priorities

    The first is what this plan doesn’t do — directly build new non-market housing, something local governments mostly lack the budget to deliver in meaningful numbers.

    “If this program helps deliver below-market units, that’s very good. But we really need to look at ensuring that some of these really traditional, rent-geared-to-income, deeply-subsidized housing projects are still getting built in the province,” said Pachal.

    Pachal and Johnstone were critical of the province investing $1.6 billion in this new plan, months after pausing or cancelling $1.4 billion in investments through the Community Housing Fund that were primarily geared toward non-profit housing projects.

    • ‘Catastrophic’ decision to scrap affordable rental program leaves projects in limbo

    “We will get the market housing built, but we still need the federal government to get back into the business of building non-market housing,” said Johnstone.

    “I’m old enough to remember when there was a mayor of Vancouver who used to say this quite often, who now has a role where I think he has his fingers on some levers,” he added, referring to federal Housing Minister Gregor Robertson.

    The second reason is that in Metro Vancouver, the new money will lower taxes on new developments — called “developer cost charges” — which local mayors had gone back and forth on in recent years as the best way to pay for the required infrastructure upgrades that come with new developments.

    =====================================================================

    Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre held a Property Rights Town Hall in West Vancouver at the Kay Meek Arts Centre. During his Metro Vancouver tour, he did not explicitly advocate for high rises; instead, he criticized dense urban towers and condemned a joint federal-B.C. government plan to purchase empty Vancouver condos for affordable housing as an unfair “bailout” for developers.

    =====================================================================
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-carney-eby-bc-condos-bailout-metro-vancouver-9.7243786

    Recent data from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation shows that as of last month, there were 4,376 completed condos sitting empty in Metro Vancouver, a 76 per cent increase from the same period a year ago.

    The prime minister did not say if the government plans to buy up units in bulk at below-market value.

    Carney said by lowering development charges for multi-unit housing by up to 50 per cent, builders could save up to $40,000 per unit, and governments would fund infrastructure such as water systems, wastewater systems and local roads.

    Poilievre said the prime minister “wants to privatize the profit and socialize the losses. In other words, make you pay the price…. There’s no free lunch here. Someone has to pay for the loss.”

    =====================================================================

    The YOU who must “pay the price”? Apparently consists of horrified people living in West Vancouver.

    Too frequently what politicians mean is a natter of undisclosed definitions,

    1/ How affordable is Affordable? What is the range of monthly rents?

    2/ Affordable for who? Who qualifies? Specifically who gets the benefits? (Other than relieved Developers faced with mountains of Debt and vacant units…)

    Like

Be on topic and civil. If your comment does not appear, email normanfarrell.ca@gmail.com

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *