Income Inequality

Sharing the tax burden with poor people

David Wiegel, writing at says,

“Republicans have finally found a group they want to tax: poor people.”

The Wall Street Journal asked former Utah Governor and Presidential candidate Jon Huntsman if working poor families and seniors should be brought onto the income tax rolls. He agreed, saying that,

“we don’t have enough people paying taxes in this country.”

Texas gunman and Presidential candidate Rick Perry agrees,

“we’re dismayed at the injustice that nearly half of all Americans don’t even pay any income tax.”

Michelle Bachmann had similar comments, adding,

“We need to broaden the base so that everybody pays something,”

Fox News’ Fox & Friends business host Stuart Varney reported:

“Yes, 47 percent of households pay not a single dime in taxes. And some of those households actually make a profit from the Treasury.” 

In fact, writes Pulitzer Prize winner New York Times writer, David Leonhardt,

“47 percent has become shorthand for the notion that the wealthy face a much higher tax burden than they once did while growing numbers of Americans are effectively on the dole.

“Neither one of those ideas is true. They rely on a cleverly selective reading of the facts. So does the 47 percent number.

“. . . Over the last 30 years, rates have fallen more for the wealthy, and especially the very wealthy, than for any other group. At the same time, their incomes have soared, and the incomes of most workers have grown only moderately faster than inflation.

“So a much greater share of income is now concentrated at the top of distribution, while each dollar there is taxed less than it once was.

“. . . the modifiers here — federal and income — are important. Income taxes aren’t the only kind of federal taxes that people pay. There are also payroll taxes and investment taxes, among others. And, of course, people pay state and local taxes, too.

“Even if the discussion is restricted to federal taxes (for which the statistics are better), a vast majority of households end up paying federal taxes. Congressional Budget Office data suggests that, at most, about 10 percent of all households pay no net federal taxes. The number 10 is obviously a lot smaller than 47.

“. . . These numbers fail to account for the income that is hidden from tax collectors — a practice, research shows, that is more common among affluent families. “Because higher-income people are understating their income,” Joel Slemrod, a tax scholar at the University of Michigan, says, “We’ve been overstating their average tax rates.”

“State and local taxes, meanwhile, may actually be regressive. That is, middle-class and poor families may face higher tax rates than the wealthy. As Kim Rueben of the Tax Policy Center notes, state and local income taxes and property taxes are less progressive than federal taxes, while sales taxes end up being regressive. The typical family pays a lot of state and local taxes, too — almost half as much as in federal taxes. . . “

2 replies »

  1. The American Tea-Party is nothing more than the American NAZI party re-branded and they have found the scapegoat to terrorize – the poor.

    Unlike the German NAZI party which boasted itself as a workers party (in reality it was a party of corporations and big business) it pretended to help the poor.

    No way with the Tea-party, which wants to treat the poor as leprous peons, who need to be 'stomped on' regularly to make sure they remain in their place. A great reservoir of poor means cheap wages for multi-national corporations.

    The Tea-Party is based on the premise that wealthy should not pay taxes and should not contribute to society. This ultimately leads to revolution. Multi-billionaire Warren Buffet sees this, but not the Kock Bros., as they continue to attack the middle and poorer classes.

    The Tea-Party and their evil ilk are lighting a fuse for social change, but the end product will certainly not be what they think. With the American Tea-Party, the American future is very dark indeed.

    Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.
    Benito Mussolini


  2. Harper is scamming every cent he can. He is spending billions on jets, billions on ships, billions on his gulags. A billion on a, stupid fake lake. That's why Harper was drooling at the mouth for,BC's HST. Everything Harper is doing is for, his own selfish agenda, and to hell with the citizens. Harper's citizens are for his, to exploit.

    Harper approves of corruption. So much as to, reward the most despised, corrupt, the worst evil premier in Canadian history as, the High Commissioner to England, the revolting Gordon Campbell. That tells us a lot about Harper.

    From Australia they said, how badly democracy has eroded in Canada. Our country is now recognized, as fascist and a dictatorship.

    None of the decent country's, want anything to do with Harper. He is lying to the world. The dirty tar sands oil, is clean energy.

    Because, Campbell has no morals or ethics, he was chosen, to con Europe, into buying the dirty oil. But, the Brits don't like Campbell's very dirty political record either. They have already demonstrated, at the office of the High Commissioner, about the dirty tar sands oil.


Leave a reply but be on topic and civil.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s