Eight months ago, Judith Lavoie wrote at DesmogCanada about Jumbo Glacier:
Stuck in the ground, halfway down the valley trail leading into the proposed Jumbo Glacier Resort, is a stick, leaning crookedly against a small tree, inscribed with the word “Lift.”
About one kilometre away, at the bottom of a recently bulldozed track into soggy underbrush, is another marker with the words “Proposed Corner of Lodge.”
The two markers, reams of flagging tape, several parked backhoes and a drill, where two employees are watching a small stream of water run into the ditch, are the only apparent signs of construction at the site in the remote heart of the Purcell Mountains.
A vital deadline is looming for Glacier Resorts Ltd., which by next month has to prove to B.C.’s Environmental Assessment Office that significant progress has been made on the billion-dollar plan to build a 6,300-bed resort on Crown land in the glacial wilderness, 55-kilometres west of Invermere.
If the company fails to convince the Environmental Assessment Office’s enforcement officers and, subsequently, Environment Minister Mary Polak, that construction is well underway, it risks losing the environmental assessment certificate granted by the province in 2004. The certificate, which expires Oct. 12, was renewed in 2009 and, under legislation cannot be renewed a second time. The company must prove that construction has “substantially started” for the certificate to become permanent…
Robyn Duncan at Wildsight reported,
The facts on the ground are clear: they have poured a couple concrete slabs and they have poured a couple footings for the base of a ski lift. After 10 years, that’s it. The concrete slabs can’t be considered foundations. Why? Because they are slabs with holes in them, where footings will later be drilled and poured. Plans to go in and alter the slabs next year for use as a foundation by adding footings, mechanical conduits, and so on, do not count towards a determination of substantial start this year. In 10 years, this is all that has been achieved on the proposed $1 billion project…
Greg Deck, Mayor of Jumbo Glacier Mountain Resort Municipality — the community with a council, a million dollar budget and no residents — saw things differently. Ms. Lavoie explained:
According to Jumbo Glacier Resort Municipality Mayor Greg Deck, everything is on track and construction is underway. “I don’t know the definition of substantial, but certainly the beginning of the lodge and the towers for the lift strike me as substantial,” he said.
Yes, that may be true, if small, non-structural slabs without footings are the beginnings of a large building for public assembly. Not true if the slabs are mere pretence. The latter possibility seems more likely because, after eight months of foot dragging, Minister Mary Polak finally cancelled the environmental assessment certificate. Perhaps Liberals will explain why the public is stuck with a 7-figure tab for an under-financed promoter’s dream. A province that charges citizens as much as $83 for a birth certificate tempers its demand for cash when political friends and corporate welfare bums are involved.
— Norm Farrell (@Norm_Farrell) June 19, 2015
The following was published at Northern Insight August 22, 2012 and, with current developments, it’s worth re-posting once more.
Bob Mackin has an interesting piece in The Tyee about a newspaper tycoon and BC Liberal abettor. David Black’s bluster was about about oil refining but the part of Mackin’s story that caught my eye involved one-time Province newspaper publisher Paddy Sherman.
In 1958, Sherman was both a news reporter and an avid mountain man. Apparently, vocation served avocation when he wrote a front page promotion for an unlikely BC ski resort. There was no financing and little substance to the extravagant plan but that didn’t bother The Province. Sherman wanted the facility to proceed so they gave it maximum splash.
Mackin provides another newspaper’s eventual headline:
Grandiose Garibaldi Scheme Falls Flat on Its No-Assets.
Some months ago, I tracked the life story of Jumbo Glacier Ski Resort. The proposal has reappeared occasionally since it was first reported in a July 1991 edition of the Vancouver Sun:
A Japanese-backed company is planning to build a $250-million year-round ski resort on a series of spectacular glaciers west of Panorama…
In 1993, The Province was calling Jumbo Glacier Resort a certainty involving European and Asian investors. Two years later, newspapers said the project was proceeding with support from a consortium of Canadian, U.S. and European investors. In 2012, the Times Colonist repeated promises the ski hill would soon be operational. NW’s Bill Good and others try to paint Jumbo as a victim of regulatory foot dragging but actually Jumbo has been an unfinanced scheme with proponents hoping that media play would attract investors. Shills in the corporate “news” operations were willing partners.
By the way, don’t plan your ski vacation at Jumbo just yet.
Media may have people like Bob Mackin aiming to report accurately and sincerely but it has many more who earn a living by shilling for special financial interests. Sometimes, the promoted is a ski hill, fish farming or “ethical oil.” Other times, it is a pipeline operator, car dealer or land developer.
The shill factor in media, especially in new media, is illustrated by a report in ZDNet:
A Federal judge overseeing the Oracle vs. Google patent lawsuit said that search giant has failed to comply with a request to document all payments to bloggers and writers covering the trial.
…U.S. District Judge William Alsup said in his order:
“The August 7 order was not limited to authors “paid . . . to report or comment” or to “quid pro quo” situations. Rather, the order was designed to bring to light authors whose statements about the issues in the case might have been influenced by the receipt of money from Google or Oracle. For example, Oracle has disclosed that it retained a blogger as a consultant. Even though the payment was for consulting work, the payment might have influenced the blogger’s reports on issues in the civil action…
Google suggests that it has paid so many commenters that it will be impossible to list them all…