Site C

The art of deception

deception 280Proponents of Site C always label it a “clean energy project.”

BC Hydro says “It will be a source of clean and renewable electricity for more than 100 years.”

Those claims may be deceptive.

A paper published by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology expresses concern about these intrusions on nature:

There are three primary reasons for the removal of dams. The first of these is environmental. Damming a river can substantially damage the surrounding ecosystem by changing the physical, chemical, and biological state of the river. This occurs when the flow of the river is reduced or altered, which hinders the flow of nutrients, sediments, and wildlife migration. Dams can also alter the temperature and oxygen levels of the water, which leads to poor water quality. This low quality of the water puts the surrounding environment at risk. Hydropower dams and their negative environmental effects can decimate fish populations (Maclin & Sicchio, 1999, 9).

Another reason for the demolition of dams is safety. With age and without proper maintenance and repairs, dams can become a significant threat to the surrounding communities. Certain dam failures even cost lives. For instance, four dam failures in the 1970s; the Buffalo Creek Dam in West Virginia, Canyon Lake Dam in South Dakota, Teton Dam in Idaho, and Kelly Barnes Dam in Georgia, resulted in the loss of 300 lives and hundreds of millions of dollars in damage (Maclin & Sicchio, 1999, 15).

The average life expectancy of a dam is 50 years, and 25% of the dams in the Army Corps of Engineers National Inventory of Dams are now more than 50 years old. This number is projected to increase to 85% by the year 2020. The decision of whether or not to remove a dam is made based on the ability to remedy the deficiencies that could cause failure (Maclin & Sicchio, 1999, 16).

Economic issues can also drive dam removal. As a dam ages, it can become less cost effective, especially as sediments build up and block the flow of water through the dam itself. In hydropower dams sediment can block the water from reaching the turbines which decreases efficiency even further.

Additionally, older dams require more frequent maintenance and incur higher costs to repair and operate. Eventually, it may be determined that it is not cost effective to continue to maintain and repair an obsolete dam. In certain cases, the actual removal of the dam costs less than making repairs. Dam demolition also eliminates the need for recurring maintenance funding, which saves money also. In certain circumstances, it may benefit the community economically to remove a dam (Maclin & Sicchio, 1999, 16).

Reservoirs are a major source of global greenhouse gases, scientists say, Washington Post, September 28, 2016:

There might be more greenhouse gases going into the atmosphere than we thought. That would mean an even larger need to cut.

The new paper, slated to be published next week in BioScience, confirms a significant volume of greenhouse gas emissions coming from a little-considered place: Man-made reservoirs…

Moreover, the emissions are largely in the form of methane, a greenhouse gas with a relatively short life in the atmosphere but a very strong short-term warming effect….

The new research concludes that methane accounted for 79 percent of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions from reservoirs, while the other two greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide, accounted for 17 percent and 4 percent...


Categories: Site C

5 replies »

  1. The Bennett Dam at Hudson Hope is older than 50 years I believe..

    And it has had some serious problems already.

    You must have read the article on Desmog, “Big Fracking Trouble with BC Hydro Dams” about Hydro’s Engineers concerned about the Clark government issuing fracking permits near Bennett and Site C dams and the possibility and consequences of a fracking quake induced dam collapse.

    Such a collapse would very likely annihilate and flood northern B.C. and Alberta according to the scientists in that article.

    Maybe this is exactly what CAI PRIVATE EQUITY PARTNERS and Tracey McVicar and David Emerson and David Johnston and their partner BCIMC want so they can buy up BC Hydro and massive tracts of land from bankrupt land owners across northern BC and Alberta for pennies just like they did with Pacific Rim Resort in Tofino and the 100’s of thousands of acres of central Vancouver Island in Canada’s biggest land covert secret land theft with the unlawful taking of the Timberwest/E&N Lands from the Province and People of BC.

    CAI and BCIMC had no problem shoving Smart Meters down the throats of unsuspecting and vulnerable BC Residents to control, surveil and potentially murder them, so wiping out northern BC and possibly Alberta so they could steal that land too would present no problem to them one wouldn’t imagine.


  2. Hello Norm: The multibillion dollar dam in Myanmar India has a lesson for BC.
    Christy Clark took BC “past the point of no return” … not in the construction of the Site C Dam, but in the Chinese AECON Money Mart loan guarantee.

    It is interesting to learn that if the Dam is not completed in Myanmar India, China will demand a $800 million from India plus $50 million annually in interest payments.
    (See the military build up along the India/Chinese boarder.)
    I wonder how much BC will have to pay the Chinese AECON Group if Site C is not completed?

    It is as if Justin Trudeau is holding John Horgan as a hostage, as China’s AECON Financial Group is holding the Federal Liberals hostage (Technology Intelligence Agreement) with all of the infrastructure spending and debt.

    It will be like making monthly payments on a car that has been repossessed while losing your AAA Credit rating.

    PS: As taxpayers, we’ve all co-signed and guaranteed the loans.
    No wonder Christy Clark is running for the Federal Conservatives … her Credit (credibility) is maxed-out with all other political parties.


  3. I think this is very important. CBC Radio’s “The Current” item this morning about ISDS in NAFTA allows foreign companies to sue Canada over our policies.

    They talk about Bilcon case in Nova Scotia but there are implications across Canada due to ISDS in NAFTA and other agreements (ie China-FIPA, TILMA) which might affect how pipelines, LNG, Site C are dealt with.

    Starts at the 22 minute mark:

    I have a report which was used to justify TILMA – the report is complete B.S.


  4. ^
    Infuriating listening to Ed Fast defending the idea of Canadians giving $millions if not $billions to foreign companies who don’t like our policies.


  5. ^
    I recall how TransCanada wanted to sue the US for $15 billion under NAFTA Ch. 11 over the blocking of Keystone XL.

    Presumably this could happen with KM pipeline expansion etc.

    NAFTA is being renegotiated now.


Leave a reply but be on topic and civil.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s