Gonzaga University is often recognized for basketball, but the 135-year-old Spokane institution is also known for academic initiatives. One is the Journal of Hate Studies, an annual peer-reviewed publication by Gonzaga’s Center for the Study of Hate:
Hate requires a response... The Gonzaga Center for Hate Studies commits itself to better understanding hate and its impact on individuals and society in the hope and expectation that there will be solutions that prevent these horrifying situations in the future.
Fomenting prejudice or hostility against others is worth attention today after organized hate groups took to the streets of Canada to demand that human rights should not be universal. Bigots believe that individual rights are a finite resource and that rights enjoyed by some result in loss of freedoms for others. These people hold views that have ceased to be accepted by the vast majority.
PBS Frontline reported on studies showing that intolerant persons with homophobic attitudes share a number of attributes. Typically, these people are:
- Less likely to have had personal contact with others having lifestyles different than their own;
- More likely to have resided in regions where negative attitudes are the norm;
- More likely to subscribe to fundamentalist religious ideology;
- More likely to hold restrictive attitudes about sex and more likely to manifest guilt or negativity about sexuality;
- More likely to support high levels of authoritarianism and related personality characteristics;
- More likely to be older and less well educated.
Openness declines gradually over many years, often beginning in the 20s. As the years wear on, novelty becomes less and less stimulating, and the world outside someone’s own private and professional sanctums becomes increasingly less attractive.
Set in Our Ways: Why Change Is So Hard
A paper written by Dr. Ellen Faulkner, now of Thompson Rivers University, was published in the Journal of Hate Studies. She reported on a long history of Canadian intolerance:
While the typical hate crime is perceived to be of a violent nature perpetrated by individuals connected to Nazi and neo-Nazi groups and white supremacists, a more insidious form of hatred exists in the form of hate propaganda. In Canada “hate messages take a variety of forms…”
Racism and hate propaganda have long been a part of the Canadian experience, beginning with attitudes toward First Nations persons in the colonial period and the resulting “campaign of de-humanization, de-tribalization and marginalization” to “the poor treatment of the Chinese in British Columbia at the turn of the century”…
A 1982 Gallup poll indicated that 31 percent of Canadians would support organizations that worked toward preserving Canada for whites only”…
Cohen thinks that “North America is undergoing a ‘third wave’ of hate propaganda, the first having been the rise of anti-Jewish and anti-Black hate propaganda in the 1960s, and the second the expansion and prosecution of those efforts in the 1970s and 1980s.” “The third wave is characterized by the dissemination of cyberhate, the expansion of target groups, and the corresponding rise in hate crimes directed at women and members of minority groups.”
…Debates about the necessity of providing protections against hate-mongering are informed by two contrasting interpretations of rights — libertarian and egalitarian…
Homophobic Hate Propaganda in Canada
Another paper about Canada is found in the Gonzaga Center for the Study of Hate. Academics Bessma Momani and Ryan Deschamps wrote Canada’s Right-Wing Extremists: Mapping their Ties, Location, and Ideas:
Canada has a resilient and long-standing international reputation for being progressive and inclusive, but there is clearly growing right-wing extremist (RWE) movements in Canada, particularly those espousing white nationalist, neo-Nazi, and anti-authority views…
Donald J. Trump’s discourse and policies (the ‘Trump effect’) have galvanized Canada’s RWEs and particularly helped to mobilize White Nationalists in Canadian politics.
While RWEs in Canada draw significant learning and even sloganeering from counterparts in the United States, there is less emphasis on gun rights and survivalism and more emphasis on ethnic nationalism, xenophobia, ‘Canadian culture,’ and positing that the political establishment is illegitimate.
…from 1960 to 2015, RWEs active in promoting hate speech have been linked to at least 71 separate terrorist incidents in Canada…
Canada’s Right-Wing Extremists: Mapping their Ties, Location, and Ideas
In the 21st century, Canada is different than it once was. Most of us are proud of diversity and egalitarianism in our country. We value those qualities. Demonstrations by bigots with pertinacious resistance to change will not alter that fact.
Categories: Civil Rights
As you say Norm, most of us.
Today’s news reminds us about the rest…
https://vancouver.citynews.ca/2023/09/25/coquitlam-port-coquitlam-racist-posters/
LikeLike
And then there’s THIS story from today, about a “whites only” moms & tots group in the Coquitlam area:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/whites-only-mother-tots-group-condemned-british-columbia-1.6977449
“Escape ‘forced diversity’ and join other proud parents of European children as we create an atmosphere in which our kids feel like they belong.”
While the signs will be removed, the sentiment will not be. I wouldn’t surprised if the group will form in secret and find a space that will let them meet. That won’t be in a school or library — but perhaps in the corner of a white-friendly warehouse. Hopefully, they will be found and exposed.
On the other hand, as a soccer referee, I’ve seen ‘select’ youth teams that are 100% Indo-Canadian. I’m not sure if non-South-Asian players were weeded out, or if they’ve self-edited themselves from registering in “that” association… Regardless, the teams don’t have the ‘look’ that one would expect in a diverse Canadian society.
LikeLike
Hope that is not the case, but it might be something the soccer league could investigate and use its influence to encourage diversity.
LikeLike
The hate has always been there, its just that people feel more free to express it openly now. With things such as Facebook, Twitter, blogs, etc. it is easier for “haters” to communicate with each other and to draw more into their web of hate. for some it gives them the sense that the world is against them and this group excepts them, they encite each other, etc.
Was just reading an article regarding, “banking while Black”. Reminds me of the case where the VPD handcuffed an Indigenous Grandfather and his 12 year old Granddaughter. Like who the hell handcuffs a 12 year old girl?
When society ignores “the little things” the big things take over. The line about 31% of Canadians supported keeping Canada “white”, whatever the hell that means, is shocking. It almost makes me laugh. Most of those people would not consider Indigenous People “white”, so where would they go? There are people who came to Canada to escape slavery in the U.S.A. Their descendants have been in Canada a lot longer than most “white Canadians”. Some African Americans came to B.C. and they built one of the first schools in B.C. on Salt Spring Island.
Then of course they would have to decide who is “white”. South Africa tried that as did the U.S.A. Doesn’t work. These racists need to get a grip. Caucasions are in the minority in this world. While “whites” were running about Europe in almost prehistoric times, there were people of colour living in amazing cities with culture, writing, agriculture, had medical knowledge Europeans didn’t get for hundreds of years. etc.
LikeLike
Case on Point – “The Further Society drifts from the truth, the more it will HATE those that speak it!!!” The quote is appropriate to this article and is usually attributed to George Orwell. Surprise, it isn’t. In a situation that is eerily reflective of the matters raised in your article, Norm, it was in fact coined by Selwyn Duke, a freelance writer who describes himself as a “teller of Truth and leftists’ worst nightmare”. Further research states that Mr. Duke “coined” the phrase when describing the banning of Michael Savage who wrote a book with the following title: Liberalism is a Mental Disorder.
I often thought that using the word “hate” in a quote attributed to George Orwell was in itself dystopian and wondered in what context Orwell would have used that phrase. Turns out he didn’t. How are we supposed to “change our course to a better world” if a quote that is widely attributed to protecting “liberalism” was originally written to defend the behaviour of a right wing fascist?
LikeLike